THE EFFECT OF LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIP AND PROCESS INTEGRATION ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE THROUGH SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AT PT POMI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v6i3.1136Keywords:
Supply Chain Management, Process Integration, Company Performance, Long-Term RelationshipAbstract
This study examines the impact of long-term relationships (LTR) and process integration (PI) on company performance, with supply chain management (SCM) as a mediator, using a quantitative approach and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM-PLS). Data from 88 suppliers in PT Paiton Operation and Maintenance Indonesia were analyzed. Results show that PI positively influences SCM, and SCM significantly enhances company performance. LTR, while important, lacks impact when it remains solely contractual and without collaborative planning. SCM is crucial for improving operational efficiency and reducing costs. This research highlights the strategic importance of SCM in linking relational and structural factors to performance outcomes, supporting frameworks like Relational View, Transaction Cost Economics, and Dynamic Capabilities Theory. The study suggests enhancing LTR through collaborative SCM practices and extending PI for optimal performance improvement.
References
[1] Acocella, A., Caplice, C., & Sheffi, Y. (2024). Great Expectations: The Moderating Effects of Supplier Service Model and Market Dynamics on Relational Contract Performance. Production and Operations Management, 33(11), 2121–2138. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241277463
[2] Ali, A., & Mahfouz, A. (2025). Building dynamic resilience capabilities for supply chain disruptions: insights from the Irish food industry. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 5567, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2025.2480628
[3] Ali, E., Jianhua, L., Rasheed, M., & Siraj, A. (2023). Measuring the impact of integration practices on firms’ supply chain performance: role of organizational antecedents in this relationship. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 41(3), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/AGJSR-10-2022-0232
[4] Baah, C., Opoku Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Issau, K., Ofori, D., & Faibil, D. (2022). Effect of information sharing in supply chains: understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking, 29(2), 434–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2020-0453
[5] Chae, S., Choi, T. Y., & Hoetker, G. (2024). Theorizing the governance of direct and indirect transactions in multi-tier supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 60(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12318
[6] Chirumalla, K., Oghazi, P., Nnewuku, R. E., Tuncay, H., & Yahyapour, N. (2025). Critical factors affecting digital transformation in manufacturing companies. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01056-3
[7] Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply Chain Management: Global Edition. In Pearson Education Limited. https://books.google.com/books/about/Supply_Chain_Management.html?id=l6oItAEACAAJ.R
[8] Christian, L., Tarigan, Z. J. H., Siagian, H., Basana, S. R., & Jie, F. (2024). The influence of supply chain integration on firm performance through lean manufacturing, green supply chain management and risk management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 2699–2712. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2024.5.002
[9] Farida, N., Joseph, N., Sheila, N., Levi, K., & Moses, M. (2024). Asset specificity, relational governance, firm adaptability and supply chain integration. Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications, 6(1), 2–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-09-2022-0021
[10] Harahap, A. K., & Marie, I. A. (2025). the Effect of Supply Chain Integration, Agility, Sustainability on Supply Chain Performance Mediated By Supply Chain Robustness and Resilience in Logistics Companies in Java Island. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(2), 4724–4744.
[11] Hendijani, R., & Saeidi Saei, R. (2020). Supply chain integration and firm performance: the moderating role of demand uncertainty. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1760477
[12] IEA. (2022). Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2022. In Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2022. https://doi.org/10.1787/10bc5730-en
[13] Jiang, F., Isa, F. M., Ng, S. P., & Bhatti, M. (2023). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration to Supply Chain Responsiveness in Chinese Electronics Manufacturing Companies. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231219070
[14] Kementerian ESDM. (2024). Statistik Ketenagalistrikan 2023 (p. 80).
[15] Kim, S., & Kim, C. (2024). Enhancing Logistics Performance through Increased Trust and Collaboration in Supply Chain Risk Management: A Focus on the Distribution Network of Manufacturing Companies. Systems, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12040141
[16] Kusviansyah, F. R., & Ardi, R. (2024). Integrated Supply Chain Quality Management and an Organizational Performance Insights: a two-stage PLS-SEM and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(6), 3006–3024. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i6.1167
[17] Marjerison, R. K., Jun, J. Y., & Kim, J. M. (2025). The Moderating Effects of Operations and Supply Chain Issues on Digital Readiness, Value Creation, and Firm Satisfaction. Systems, 13(5), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13050369
[18] Owot, G. M., Okello, D. M., Olido, K., & Odongo, W. (2023). Trust-supply chain performance relationships: unraveling the mediating role of transaction cost attributes in agribusiness SMEs. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1113819
[19] Qian, C., Dion, P. A., Wagner, R., & Seuring, S. (2023). Efficacy of supply chain relationships – differences in performance appraisals between buyers and suppliers. Operations Management Research, 16(3), 1302–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00354-3
[20] Qureshi, K. M., Mewada, B. G., Kaur, S., Alghamdi, S. Y., Almakayeel, N., Almuflih, A. S., & Qureshi, M. R. N. M. (2023). Sustainable Manufacturing Supply Chain Performance Enhancement through Technology Utilization and Process Innovation in Industry 4.0: A SEM-PLS Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115388
[21] Ratna Ayu Wulandari, Meylisa Haristi, & Yoel Santo Andrianus Sormin. (2024). Improving service supply chain performance with the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) approach; Case study: Indonesia government testing laboratory. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 22(3), 742–756. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.22.3.1678
[22] Santosa, W., & Dewayana, T. S. (2024). THE INFLUENCE OF SUPPLY CHAIN DIGITALIZATION ON INTEGRATION AND AGILITY IN COMPANY PERFORMANCE Ikrima. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(3), 7852–7869.
[23] Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2021). Design-and-Managing-The-Supply-Chain-Concepts-Strategies-and-Case-Studies-David-Simchi-Levi-Edisi-1-2000. In McGraw-Hill Higher Education (pp. 8–15).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diah Nurhayati Mailasufa, Muhammad Ridwan Basalamah, Eka Farida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




