ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYE TURNOVER FACTORS ON WORK EFFECTIVENESS THROUGH RISK CONTROL AT BPJS KETENAGAKERJAAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v6i4.1210Keywords:
Content, Fewest, Paper.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of employe turnover factors on work effectiveness thru risk management at BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. The factors studied include job satisfaction, compensation, workload, role ambiguity, and relationships with supervisors. This research uses a quantitative approach with the Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) method and Bow Tie Analysis. The sample consisted of 251 active BPJS Ketenagakerjaan employes selected using purposive sampling technique. The data collection instrument uses a Likert scale-based questionnaire. Validity and reliability were tested thru outer loading, construct reliability, and AVE, as well as discriminant validity thru HTMT and the Fornell-Larcker Criterion. The results show that all five turnover factors significantly affect work effectiveness, both directly and thru risk management. The variables of job satisfaction (? = 0.379, p = 0.000) and relationship with superiors (? = 0.173, p = 0.016) have a significant positive influence. Conversely, workload (? = -0.149, p = 0.000) and role ambiguity (? = -0.117, p = 0.000) have a negative influence. Risk control was also proven to be a significant mediator. The R² value of 0.778 for work effectiveness indicates the model's strong predictive ability. This research integrates the SEM-PLS approach with Bow Tie Analysis in the context of public organizations, and provides an empirical contribution to turnover risk control strategies to improve work effectiveness.
References
[1] W. Astuti and T. K. Dewi, “Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Motivasi terhadap Turnover Karyawan pada PT Distributor Motor Indonesia di Jakarta Selatan,” Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2022.
[2] M. Basri and R. Arsal, “Pengaruh efektivitas dan efisiensi kerja pegawai terhadap kinerja organisasi Dinas Sosial Kota Kendari,” Journal Publicuho, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1127–1138, 2022.
[3] J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage Publication, 2017.
[4] T. Megaster, “Pengaruh Ambiguitas Peran dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Turnover Karyawan pada PT Pandawa Solusindo Nusantara,” Dynamic Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2022.
[5] Miftahurrohman and Munifah, “Dampak Turnover Pegawai Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Perguruan Tinggi di Jawa Tengah,” JUBIKIN: Jurnal Bisnis Kreatif dan Inovatif, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 100–110, 2024.
[6] H. Nuraini, “Manajemen Risiko untuk Meminimalisir Masalah Perusahaan,” OPTIMAL: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 339–350, 2022.
[7] D. Pratiwi and B. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Industri Perbankan,” Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 73–94, 2018.
[8] PT Astra International Tbk., Menginspirasi Kemajuan Menuju Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: PT Astra International Tbk., 2019.
[9] PT Astra International Tbk., Semangat Saling Bantu. Jakarta: PT Astra International Tbk., 2020.
[10] PT Astra International Tbk., Memberdayakan Anak Bangsa dalam Perjalanan Transisi. Jakarta: PT Astra International Tbk., 2021.
[11] PT Astra International Tbk., Menciptakan Dampak Positif Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: PT Astra International Tbk., 2022.
[12] PT Astra International Tbk., Driving Purposeful Sustainable Growth. Jakarta: PT Astra International Tbk., 2023.
[13] PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., Tebar Inspirasi Penerus Negeri. Jakarta: PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., 2019.
[14] PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., Integrasi dan Kolaborasi Melalui Digitalisasi Berkelanjutan. Laporan Tahunan 2020. Jakarta: PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., 2020.
[15] PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., Melanjutkan Transformasi Digital & Inovasi Perbankan. Jakarta: PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., 2021.
[16] PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., Transformasi Digital dengan Excellent Result. Jakarta: PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., 2022.
[17] PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., Selalu Menghadirkan Selalu Terdepan. Jakarta: PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk., 2023.
[18] F. Rasyid, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: Teori, Metode, dan Praktek. Kediri: IAIN Kediri Press, 2022.
[19] M. Rayhan, Azwar, and A. Mustofa, “Pengaruh Beban Kerja dan Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Efektivitas Kerja Karyawan Bagian Produksi Pada PT Weida Sejahtera,” Jurnal Administrasi Profesional, vol. 3, no. 1, 2022.
[20] N. Salsabila and B. F. Tumanggor, “Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Turnover Intention Pegawai di PT PKSS Jakarta 1,” Jurnal STIA LAN, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 90–103, 2023.
[21] H. Sugiyanto, C. Afianto, and M. M. Mizan, “Pengaruh Kompensasi dan Pengembangan Karir Terhadap Turnover Intention Karyawan yang Dimediasi oleh Kepuasan Kerja,” Master: Jurnal Manajemen Strategik Kewirausahaan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 97–108, 2022.
[22] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
[23] F. Valentino and W. H. Adji, “Pengaruh Beban Kerja Terhadap Efektivitas Kerja Karyawan di Dinas Perdagangan Kota Bandung,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 376–380, 2023.
[24] K. D. Wibisono, T. Y. R. Syah, and D. A. Negoro, “Analisis Manajemen Risiko Pemasaran, Operasional, Human Capital, dan Finance pada PT Agrindo Sumber Harum,” JIMEA: Jurnal Ilmiah MEA, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1895–1901, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mughny Ilman Wali Rusdi, Nimmi Zulbainarni, Asep Taryana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




