FEMINIST ACCOUNTING AND THE NARRATIVE OF STATE FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i1.1261Keywords:
Budget narrative, Feminist accounting, Fiscal accountability, State Budget, Power relationsAbstract
This research aims to analyze how fiscal accountability is constructed in budget narratives from a feminist accounting perspective. The research uses qualitative content analysis with a critical paradigm applied to the narrative text of the 2023-2025 State Budget Financial Notes. The analysis is conducted using the directed content analysis framework derived from feminist accounting and critical accounting theories. The research findings indicate that fiscal accountability is predominantly framed by a masculine fiscal rationality that emphasizes efficiency, stability, and economic growth. Technocratic language and procedural compliance serve as legitimizing mechanisms that reinforce the centralization of state control. In this framing, women's care work and contributions experience structural invisibility, while the care dimension is reduced to output-based sectoral programs. This research expands the theoretical understanding that fiscal accountability is not value-neutral, but rather shaped by power relations and specific measurement logics. In terms of policy, these findings indicate the need for a shift toward fiscal accountability that is more relational and sensitive to care and social justice. The novelty of this research lies in its critical reading of the state budget narrative as an accounting practice that both reproduces and limits the meaning of fiscal accountability.
References
[1] Amaliah, T. H., & Mattoasi. (2020). REFLEKSI NILAI DI BALIK PENETAPAN HARGA UMOONU. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 402–419. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ja-mal.2020.11.2.24
[2] Argento, D., Dobija, D., Grossi, G., Marrone, M., & Mora, L. (2025). The unaccounted effects of digital transformation: implications for accounting, auditing and accountability research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 38(3), 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2025-7670
[3] Bracci, E., Saliterer, I., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2021). Accounting for (public) value(s): reconsidering publicness in accounting research and practice Available to Purchase. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1513–1526. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2021-5318
[4] Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2003). CONTROL AND LEGITIMATION IN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROCESSES: THE PRIVATE FINANCE INITIATIVE IN THE UK. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00039-4
[5] Canestrini, P., Galizzi, G., & Siboni, B. (2025). Addressing gender (in)equality in the health sector: gender-responsive budgeting as an accounting process for creating public value. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 37(6), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2023-0130
[6] Cordery, C., Arora, B., & Manochin, M. (2023). Public sector audit and the state’s responsibility to “leave no-one behind”: The role of integrated democratic accountability. Financial Accountability and Management, 39(2), 304–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12354
[7] Dillard, J., & Vinnari, E. (2019). Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.003
[8] Fatimah, M., & Dwi Retnandari, N. (2024). Central-Local Government Relations in Regional Planning and Budgeting in Indonesia: Between Autonomy and Control Introduction. Policy & Governance Review, 8(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v8i2.922
[9] F?rt?n, C. E. (2023). Accountingisation of social care: the multiplicity and embeddedness of calculations and valuations in costing and caring practices. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 20(1), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2021-0048
[10] Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600768512
[11] Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. (2003). Accounting and Emancipation. Routledge Studies in Accounting.
[12] Haynes, K. (2017). Accounting as gendering and gendered: A review of 25 years of critical accounting research on gender. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.004
[13] Haynes, K. (2024). The role of accounting in creating, perpetuating, and overcoming inequalities: Going beyond discipline, borders, and stasis towards accounting as activism. Gender, Work and Organization, 32(2), 912–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13191
[14] Heald, D., & Hodges, R. (2024). The failure of the United Kingdom’s accounting and fiscal governance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 37(9), 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2023-6513
[15] Hines, R. D. (1988). FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING: IN COMMUNICATING REALITY, WE CONSTRUCT REALITY*. Accounting, Organizations and Socie!Y, 13(3), 251–261.
[16] Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
[17] Ilkkaracan, I., Kim, K., Masterson, T., Memi?, E., & Zacharias, A. (2021). The impact of investing in social care on employment generation, time-, income-poverty by gender: A macro-micro policy simulation for Turkey. World Development, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105476
[18] Khalifa, R., & Scarparo, S. (2021). Gender Responsive Budgeting: A tool for gender equality. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102183
[19] Krippendorff, K. (2022). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
[20] Lehman, C. R. (1992). “HERSTORY” IN ACCOUNTING: THE FIRST EIGHTY YEARS*. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(4), 261–285.
[21] Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Pianezzi, D. (2019). New Public Management between reality and illusion: Analysing the validity of performance-based budgeting. The British Accounting Review, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.02.007
[22] Niswatin, & Yusuf, N. (2023). Dulahu sebagai Model Penganggaran Uni¬versitas Berbasis Budaya Gorontalo. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ja¬mal.2023.14.2.28
[23] Pilon, M., & Brouard, F. (2022). Conceptualizing accountability as an integrated system of relationships, governance, and information. In Financial Accountability and Management (Vol. 39, Issue 2, pp. 421–446). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12323
[24] Polzer, T., Nolte, I. M., & Seiwald, J. (2021). Gender budgeting in public financial management: a literature review and research agenda. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(2), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211031796
[25] Risse, L. (2025). By How Much Is ‘Women’s Work’ Undervalued in the Economy?*. Economic Record. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.70012
[26] Rubin, M. M., & Bartle, J. R. (2021). Gender-responsive budgeting: A budget reform to address gender inequity. Public Administration, 101(2), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12802
[27] Van der Kolk, B. (2022). Performance measurement in the public sector: Mapping 20 years of survey research. In Financial Accountability and Management (Vol. 38, Issue 4, pp. 703–729). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12345
[28] Wittbom, E. E., & Häyrén, A. I. (2021). Post-NPM gender accounting—can public value management enhance gender mainstreaming? Public Money and Management, 41(7), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1929432
[29] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fityan Halid, Niswatin, Tri Handayani Amaliah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




