MORAL AGENCY IN CHALLENGING CONTEXTS: AN INTERPRETATIVE PHENOMENOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS’ EXPERIENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1297Keywords:
Electoral Integrity Interpretative, Moral Agency, Organizational Commitment, Phenomenology, Professional IdentityAbstract
This research investigates the lived realities of election commissioners operating under persistent institutional constraints during a local electoral process. Contemporary electoral research frequently depicts election administrators merely as procedural agents, providing insufficient insight into their ethical and psychological dimensions. This inquiry seeks to elucidate how election commissioners perceive pressure, moral obligation, professional dedication, and self-identity within the context of their daily responsibilities. Employing an interpretative phenomenological framework, information was gathered from six local election commissioners through solicited written responses via electronic mail, facilitating profound contemplation on their professional encounters. The gathered data underwent analysis through reflective thematic evaluation. The outcomes unveil four interrelated themes: ongoing structural pressures necessitating ethical discretion, moral impetus extending beyond mere procedural adherence, organizational allegiance functioning as a psychological safeguard, and the continual evolution of professional identity through ethical introspection. These results suggest that electoral integrity arises from the dynamic interplay between individual values and institutional expectations rather than solely from formal regulations. The study enhances psychological insights into moral agency within public service and underscores the necessity for institutional backing, ethical resilience training, and psychosocial support for election officials.
References
[1] Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
[2] Bae, J.-H., Son, J. Y., & Song, M. (2013). Analysis of Twitter for 2012 South Korea Presidential Election by Text Mining Techniques. https://doi.org/10.13088/JIIS.2013.19.3.141
[3] Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.
[4] Barnes, C. Y. (2020). Administrative burden and the cost of compliance. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13129
[5] Barus, Y. (2020). Profesionalisme penyelenggara pemilu. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 45–60.
[6] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. In SAGE Publication. SAGE Publications.
[7] Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1999). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. University of Michigan Press.
[8] Christensen, J., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2021). Administrative burden in public administration. Policy & Society, 40(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1901567
[9] Cooper, T. L. (2015). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
[10] Creswell, J. W., & Miller, G. (2003). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
[11] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. In SAGE Publication (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[12] DKPP. (2025). Putusan perkara pelanggaran etik KPU Tapanuli Selatan dan Labuhanbatu Utara.
[13] Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2020). An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. In An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779
[14] Ehrenberg, R. G., & Smith, R. S. (2016). Modern labor economics: Theory and public policy. books.google.com.
[15] Flick, U. (2022). Revitalising Triangulation for Designing Multi-perspective Qualitative Research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278.n40
[16] Folke, O., Rickne, J., & Smith, D. M. (2018). Gender and Dynastic Political Selection. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020938089
[17] Gleeson, D. (2021). Research Questions and Research Design. In Educational Research and Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474243834.ch-005
[18] Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. In M. I. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 351–372). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14343-016
[19] Guerrero-Solé, F. (2018). Interactive Behavior in Political Discussions on Twitter: Politicians, Media, and Citizens’ Patterns of Interaction in the 2015 and 2016 Electoral Campaigns in Spain. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118808776
[20] Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2019). Administrative burdens: Policy design and implementation. In Russell Sage Foundation. Oxford University Press.
[21] Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2024). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448519
[22] Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Routledge.
[23] Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 764–791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667055
[24] Jones, B. (2019). Public Service Chatbots: Automating Conversation with BBC News. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 1032–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1609371
[25] Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Cooper, J. T. (2012). Conceptual foundations of workplace commitments. In Commitment in organizations (pp. 30–51). Routledge.
[26] Lawrie Van de Ven, K. (2010). Spectacular Paris: Representations of Nostalgia and Desire. Paroles Gelées, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/pg7261003200
[27] Lechner, S., Jacometti, J., McBean, G., & Mitchison, N. (2016). Resilience in a complex world – Avoiding cross-sector collapse. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.006
[28] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2023). Naturalistic inquiry. In Elsevier eBooks. SAGE Publications.
[29] Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
[30] Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.
[31] Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
[32] Meho, I. (2006). Email interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 24(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439305281305
[33] Meyer, G. (1994). Social Information Processing and Social Networks: A Test of Social Influence Mechanisms. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700901
[34] Meyer, J. P. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
[35] Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20786060
[36] Reissman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE Publications.
[37] Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Psychology Press.
[38] Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.145
[39] Sawir, M. (2024). Dinamika aspirasi politik Pilkada. Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Otonomi Daerah, 16(1), 25–42.
[40] Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition. Quality and Quantity, Vol. 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
[41] Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
[42] Tummers, L., & Knies, E. (2023). Public professionals and policy implementation. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12470
[43] Vandenabeele, W. (2016). Toward a theory of public service motivation. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701726697
[44] Wens, M. L. K., Mwangi, M. N., van Loon, A. F., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2021). Complexities of drought adaptive behaviour: Linking theory to data on smallholder farmer adaptation decisions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102435
[45] Weyant, E. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th Edition. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Robby Effendi, Risydah Fadilah, Suaidah Lubis, Juliana, Dwi Putri, Siti Sariah Bangun, Fransisca Mularia Butar Butar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
