INTERFAITH MARRIAGE FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE INDONESIA AND THAILAND: BETWEEN REGULATION AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i1.1321Keywords:
Comparative Law, Freedom of Religion, Interfaith Marriage, Legal Certainty, Marriage Law.Abstract
Interfaith marriage is a social phenomenon that continues to grow in multicultural societies, but still raises legal debates regarding legal certainty and freedom of religion. This article aims to analyze the implementation of legal norms regarding interfaith marriage in social and institutional practices in Indonesia and Thailand, as well as to assess the extent to which legal regulations in both countries reflect a balance between legal certainty and freedom of religion. This study uses a normative legal research method with a regulatory, conceptual, and comparative approach. Data was obtained through a literature study of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which were then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show that in Indonesia, interfaith marriages face significant legal obstacles because the marriage law system still uses religion as the basis for the validity of marriage, as stipulated in Law Number 1 of 1974. This condition creates legal uncertainty and encourages couples to pursue alternative strategies, such as applying for a court ruling or getting married abroad. In contrast, Thailand implements a more secular and administrative marriage law system, where the validity of marriage is determined through civil registration without requiring religious similarity, although in Muslim communities the role of the Islamic Religious Council remains influential socially and religiously. This study concludes that the regulation of interfaith marriage in Thailand is relatively more capable of balancing legal certainty and religious freedom compared to Indonesia. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate marriage law policies in Indonesia to be more adaptive and inclusive in order to respond to the social reality of a pluralistic society without neglecting constitutional and social values.
References
[1] Nugroho, D. Y. (2025). Jangan kaget! Ini jumlah pasangan nikah beda agama di Indonesia. Populis. https://populis.id/read13644/jangan-kaget-ini-jumlah-pasangan-nikah-beda-agama-di-indonesia?page=2
[2] Rusli, & Tama, R. (2019). Hukum perkawinan di Indonesia: Perspektif agama dan negara. Rajawali Pers.
[3] Maloko, M. T. (2024). Analyzing the prohibition of interfaith marriage in Indonesia: Legal, religious, and human rights perspectives. Cogent Social Science, (1), 1–2.
[4] Supanichwatana, S., & Laeheem, K. (2024). Social acceptance and adjustment of spouses in multicultural families to reduce violent behavioral conflicts in Mueang District, Yala Province. PLOS ONE, (3).
[5] Salaeh, F., & Darmawati, D. (2020). Studi perbandingan hukum perkawinan Islam di Indonesia dan Thailand. QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan, 5(1).
[6] Ningtias, D. A., & Wahab, A. (2019). Peran Majelis Agama Islam Nakhon Si Thammarat Thailand dalam pernikahan beda agama perspektif Undang-Undang Hukum Keluarga Thailand. Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 8(1).
[7] Sitompul, R. K. P., & Riza, F. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap kebebasan beragama bagi masyarakat minoritas. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian, (1).
[8] Hermanto, Y. R. (2024). Perkawinan beda agama menurut hukum positif, hukum Islam, dan hak asasi manusia di Indonesia. JOLSIC, (1).
[9] Sihombing, E. N. A. M., & Hadita, C. (2022). Penelitian hukum. Setara Press.
[10] Kurniasih, D., et al. (2021). Teknik analisa. Alfabeta.
[11] Riyadhi, F., Mahaee, A., & Ngazizah, I. F. (2025). Interfaith marriage in Salatiga (Indonesia) and Yala (Thailand): Legal constraints, social realities and human rights implications. YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam.
[12] Alimuddin, K. (2023). Praktik perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia dalam tinjauan fenomenologi sosial. ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law.
[13] Yannor, P. (2020). Menelaah perkawinan beda agama menurut hukum positif. Jurnal Bagian Hukum Setda Kabupaten Tanah Laut.
[14] Afda’u, F., Prasetyo, B., & Saryana, S. (2024). Membedah pengaturan dan sanksi pernikahan beda agama dalam hukum Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 13(2).
[15] Hidayat, M. (2023). Pluralisme hukum perkawinan di Indonesia (hlm. 80–150). UII Press.
[16] Irawan, R., Isnaini, A. M., & Rifai, A. (2024). Analisis perkawinan beda agama ditinjau dari peraturan hukum di Indonesia (Studi Putusan No: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Surabaya). UNIZAR Recht Journal (URJ), 3(1).
[17] Irawan, A., Al-Amruzi, M. F., & Sarmadi, A. S. (2025). Hukum keluarga di Negeri Gajah Putih Thailand. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(1).
[18] Irawan, A. (2024). Legal pluralism and Islamic family law in Southern Thailand. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, 6(1), 58–60.
[19] Sumarna, R., Rifai, A., & Fuad, F. (2025). Kepastian hukum perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia. Jurnal Bedah Hukum.
[20] Aji, R. P., Saputra, D. Y., Laksono, R. B., & Irawan, A. (2025). Perkawinan beda agama dalam perspektif hak konstitusional dan hukum positif. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 3(3).
[21] Ifham, D. H., Sembiring, R., & Barus, U. M. (2025). Interfaith marriage between human right and state law. International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology, 7(1).
[22] Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2023, January 31). Court rejects petition on interfaith marriage. https://en.mkri.id/news/details/2023-01-31/Court_Rejects_Petition_on_Interfaith_Marriage
[23] Maulida, G., & Hikmah, N. (2023). Kesadaran hukum pelaku perkawinan beda agama di Indonesia. NOVUM: Jurnal Hukum.
[24] Putra, P. P. D. N. (2025). The legality of interfaith marriage: A comparison between Thailand and United Arab Emirates. Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum.
[25] Rahmi, A. (2016). Fungsi pencatatan perkawinan dikaitkan dengan upaya perlindungan hukum terhadap anak setelah putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Jurnal De Lega Lata, 1(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dea Pratiwi, Atikah Rahmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
