HEXAHELIX COLLABORATION IN FLASH FLOOD DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE LAKE TOBA AREA

Sahrul Ramadhan; Audia Junita; Beby Masitho Batubara

doi:10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1343

Authors

Sahrul Ramadhan Universitas Medan Area
Audia Junita Universitas Medan Area
Beby Masitho Batubara Universitas Medan Area

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1343

Keywords:

Disaster Management, Flash Floods, Governance, Hexahelix Collaboration, Lake Toba

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the governance of Hexahelix collaboration in the implementation of flash flood disaster management in the Lake Toba Area and to identify the constraints and obstacles encountered in its implementation. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, with data collection techniques through interviews, observations, and documentation. The research informants consisted of the Head of the Regional Disaster Management Agency (BPBD) of North Sumatra Province, the Head of the Cooperation, Control and Evaluation Division of BPBD North Sumatra Province, Staff of the Community and Environmental Empowerment Department of PT Inalum Hydropower, the Chair of the Pandawa Kayak Organization of North Sumatra, the Director of the Center for Climate Change and Disaster Mitigation Studies of the Faculty of Forestry, University of North Sumatra, and a journalist from Tribun Medan. The results of the study indicate that the role of the Regional Disaster Management Agency has been carried out in accordance with the concept of governance, where disaster management is no longer centered solely on the government but involves various actors within a collaborative framework. However, the implementation of Hexahelix collaboration has not been fully optimal, particularly in the pre-disaster phase, which still requires strengthened coordination, increased human resource capacity, and cross-sectoral program integration. Internal constraints include the limited number of disaster-certified personnel, while external constraints are related to the persistence of communities residing in flash flood–prone areas due to livelihood factors. This study recommends enhancing the capacity of disaster management personnel, strengthening scientific studies as a basis for policy, developing more integrated multisectoral collaboration, promoting development oriented toward disaster risk reduction, and increasing the transparency of information that is easily accessible to the public.

References

[1] Calzada, I. (2016). From Smart Cities to Experimental Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(4), 77–93.

[2] Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

[3] Kapucu, N. (2006). Interagency Communication Networks During Emergencies: Boundary Spanners in Multiagency Coordination. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225.

[4] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

[5] Osborne, S. P. (2010). The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. Routledge.

[6] Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.

[7] Waugh, W. L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 131–140.

[8] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.

[9] Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Penanggulangan Bencana.

[10] Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2008 tentang Pendanaan dan Pengelolaan Bantuan Bencana.

[11] Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2008 tentang Peran Serta Lembaga Internasional dan Lembaga Asing Nonpemerintah dalam Penanggulangan Bencana.

[12] Peraturan Kepala BNPB Nomor 4 Tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Rencana Penanggulangan Bencana.

[13] Andriani, L., & Sasmita, D. (2020). Pengelolaan Bencana Alam dengan Pendekatan Multi-Actor Governance. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial dan Pembangunan, 5(1), 16-24.

[14] Sumarni, S., & Susilawati, R. (2019). Meningkatkan Ketahanan Masyarakat dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Alam. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 10-22.

[15] Iskandar, E. (2017). Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam untuk Penanggulangan Bencana Alam di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 10(3), 78-92.

[16] Putra, A. D., & Sari, F. (2018). Penanggulangan Bencana Alam dengan Kerjasama Antar-Pemangku Kepentingan. Jurnal Manajemen Bencana, 11(4), 45-59.

[17] Wijaya, R. A., & Subekti, A. (2020). Model Pengelolaan Bencana dengan Pendekatan Kewirausahaan Sosial. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Sosial, 6(2), 112-124.

[18] Hidayat, A. (2021). Peran Media dalam Penyebaran Informasi Bencana Alam. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Informasi, 9(3), 150-163.

[19] Sumartono, S., & Azis, M. S. (2019). Pendekatan Partisipatif dalam Manajemen Risiko Bencana. Jurnal Penanggulangan Bencana, 13(2), 22-38

[20] Khusaini, Z., & Karim, A. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Penanggulangan Bencana di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(4), 110-121.

[21] Faisal, M. (2022). Kolaborasi Multistakeholder dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Alam di Daerah Rawan Banjir. Jurnal Perencanaan dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam, 4(2), 56-72.

[22] Yusuf, A., & Khairani, S. (2020). Kontribusi Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat dalam Manajemen Bencana Alam. Jurnal Studi Pembangunan Sosial, 7(1), 77-90.