PUBLIC SERVICE PERFORMANCE IN THE SIBOLGA SAMBAS DISTRICT OF NORTH SUMATRA PROVINCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1359Keywords:
Employee Performance, Public Service, Service Quality, Subdistrict Office.Abstract
This study aims to analyze employee performance in public service delivery at the Sibolga Sambas Subdistrict Office, North Sumatra Province, and to identify the inhibiting factors affecting such performance. Public service performance is a key indicator in achieving good governance; therefore, employee performance plays a crucial role in determining the quality of services received by the community. This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation involving key informants, including the subdistrict secretary, staff members, and community members as service users. The analysis of public service performance refers to the service quality dimensions proposed by Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry, namely tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, and assurance. The findings indicate that employee performance in public service delivery at the Sibolga Sambas Subdistrict Office is generally categorized as fairly good, particularly in terms of responsiveness and assurance. However, several obstacles remain in the aspects of reliability and tangibles, such as limited facilities and infrastructure, as well as suboptimal service systems. The inhibiting factors include limited operational budgets, uneven workload distribution, lack of capacity-building training, and an evaluation system that has not been fully optimized. Therefore, improvement efforts are required through enhancing employee competence, strengthening performance management, and providing adequate facilities and infrastructure to sustainably improve public service quality.
References
[1] H. Pasolong, Teori Administrasi Publik, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.
[2] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik, 2009.
[3] M. Hayat, Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2017.
[4] Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, “Keputusan Menteri PAN Nomor 63 Tahun 2003 tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik,” 2003.
[5] B. Baharuddin, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1999.
[6] A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 12–40, 1988.
[7] S. P. Robbins and T. A. Judge, Organizational Behavior, 17th ed., Boston, MA: Pearson, 2018.
[8] Sedarmayanti, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Reformasi Birokrasi dan Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2021.
[9] M. L. Dwiyanto, Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2014.
[10] A. M. Huberman, M. B. Miles, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.
[11] L. J. Sinambela, Reformasi Pelayanan Publik: Teori, Kebijakan dan Implementasi, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2010.
[12] Moenir, Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2015.
[13] F. Tjiptono, Service Management: Mewujudkan Layanan Prima, Yogyakarta: Andi, 2016.
[14] A. A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
[15] Wibowo, Manajemen Kinerja, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ardhiansa Panggabean, Maksum Syahri Lubis, Beby Mashito Batubara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



