THE EFFECT OF SELF-DISCLOSURE ON EMOTIONAL REGULATION WITH THE MEDIATION OF FAMILY SUPPORT IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i2.1367Keywords:
Emotion Regulation, Family Support, Self-Disclosure.Abstract
Adolescence is a developmental stage characterized by significant biological, cognitive, and socio-emotional changes that require effective emotion regulation. This study aimed to examine the effect of self-disclosure on emotion regulation among high school students, with family support as a mediating variable. A quantitative approach was used with a population of 632 students and a sample of 200 respondents selected through random sampling. Data were collected using Likert-scale questionnaires, including the Revised Self-Disclosure Scale, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (Gross & John, 2003), and the Family Support Scale. Data analysis was conducted using SEM-PLS with JASP 0.19.3.0. The results showed that several self-disclosure dimensions significantly influenced emotion regulation. Intended disclosure (Beta = 0.190; p = 0.007), honesty-accuracy (Beta = 0.144; p = 0.040), and control of general depth (Beta = 0.170; p = 0.020) had a positive effect on cognitive reappraisal. The amount factor (Beta = 0.281; p < 0.001), honesty-accuracy (Beta = 0.150; p = 0.030), and control of general depth (Beta = 0.206; p = 0.004) significantly affected expressive suppression. Overall, self-disclosure contributed more consistently to emotion regulation and perceived family support than the direct effect of family support on emotion regulation. These findings highlight the importance of self-disclosure and supportive family environments in improving students’ emotion regulation abilities.
References
[1] J. Santrock, “Adolescence (12th Edition),” In New York : Mcgraw Hill, 2017.
[2] J. Gross, Handbook of emotion regulation, New York: Guilford Press, 2007.
[3] Gloria, “hasil survei I-NAMHS : satu dari tiga remaja indonesia memiliki masalah kesehatan mental,” 2022.
[4] J. &. J. O. Gross, “Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes : implication for affect, relationship and well-being,” Journal of personality and social psychology, pp. 348-362, 2003.
[5] R. Thompson, “Emotion and emotion Regulation: two sides of the developing coin,” Emotion Review, pp. 53-61, 2011.
[6] J. Devito, “The interpersonal comunication book,” pearson hinger education, 2018.
[7] S. Azwar, Metode Penelitian Psikologi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2022.
[8] Sugiyono, Metode Penellitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
[9] L. &. G. J. Wheeless, “Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure,” human comunication research, pp. 338-346, 1976.
[10] H. N. N. &. N. A. S. Radde, “uji validitas konstrak dari emotion regulation questionnaire versi bahasa indonesia dengan menggunakan confirmatory factor analysis,” jurnal psikologi karakter, pp. 152-160, 2021.
[11] M. &. H. K. Procidano, “Measure of perceived social support from friends and from family: three validation studies,” american journal of community psychology, pp. 1-24, 1983.
[12] V. e. a. Kurniawan, “The impact of gadget addiction on teenagers,” prima wiyata health, pp. 40-48, 2025.
[13] I. Ghozali, Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23 (edisi 8) cetakan ke VIII, semarang: badan penerbit universitas diponegoro, 2016.
[14] e. a. Derlega, Self disclosure, newbug park: sage publication, inc, 1993.
[15] E. Sarafino, health psychology: biopsychosocial interactions, new york: John wiley& sons, inc, 1988.
[16] H. &. C. C. Grotevant, “patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence,” child development, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 415-428, 1985.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rani Nainggolan, Hasanuddin, Suryani Hardjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
