VISITOR INTEREST AT THE ASAHAN REGENCY LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES DEPARTMENT

Authors

  • Desy Iradani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Yusra Dewi Siregar Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53806/ijcss.v7i3.1541

Keywords:

EFA, Library Visits, Service Quality, Internal Factors, Social Influence

Abstract

This study aims to identify the factors influencing visitors’ interest in visiting the Regional Library and Archives Office of Asahan Regency. The research employed a quantitative approach with a sample of 112 respondents selected using accidental sampling. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with SPSS version 27. The results indicate that the data are feasible for factor analysis, as shown by the KMO value of 0.807 and a significance level of 0.000. The analysis produced three main factors with eigenvalues greater than 1, namely 4.728, 2.444, and 1.214. The first factor relates to service quality and library facilities, the second factor represents internal user conditions, and the third factor reflects social influences. Among all variables, internet dependency shows the highest contribution, while location access shows the lowest. These findings provide empirical evidence that visitors’ interest is influenced by service quality, personal motivation, and social environment.

References

[1] Aghni, R. 2024. Pengaruh lingkungan fisik perpustakaan terhadap minat kunjung. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 5(1), 45–55.

[2] Aurelia, D. 2023. Pengaruh Bahan Pustaka Terhadap Minat Kunjung di Perpustakaan. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 4(2), 67–75.

[3] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Statistik sosial budaya Indonesia. BPS

[4] Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 1–9.

[5] Creswell, J. W. 2020. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[6] Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

[7] Field, A. 2018. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications

[8] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2019. Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. IFLA. 2020. Libraries, digital transformation and COVID-19. International Federation of Library Associations

[9] Perpustakaan Nasional RI. 2022. Laporan kinerja perpustakaan nasional. Perpusnas RI.

[10] Rahmawati, N., & Siregar, R. 2024. Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan pemustaka. Jurnal Perpustakaan Indonesia, 6(1), 12–20.

[11] Sari, D., & Pratama, A. 2021. Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi minat kunjung perpustakaan. Jurnal Literasi, 3(2), 101–110.

[12] Sugiyono. 2019. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

[13] Sulistyo-Basuki. 2019. Pengantar ilmu perpustakaan. Gramedia.

[14] Sutarno, N. S. 2018. Manajemen perpustakaan. Sagung Seto.

[15] Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. 2019. Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.

[16] Vitriana, N. 2024. Transformasi perpustakaan di era digital native. Librarium: Library and Information Science Journal, 1(1), 59–69.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30